Re: The Mighty Mitsubishi Pajero Sport Drives In [7K Kms Crossed]
I am surprised to not see fortuner in your list ?
Build Quality wise Pajero is the best! Its the best sub 30L on/off roader in my books though i am a big fan of the fortuner too!
I like "macho" image, utmost reliability of Toyoto & 3rd row luxury of TF, but I don't want Innova interiors again, & more because it is costliest of XUV/Rexton Rx6/PS/TF but with bare minimum features (e.g. VSC only with AT & AT has no 4WD)
.... your needs should dictate whether you need features/softroader vs all out allrounder true SUV.
Sorry did't mentioned my needs. I am absolute onroader (mainly chauffer driven since my accidents) except few trips to my farmhouse in monsoon required 0.5/1 km patch of mild slush road where my Innova/i10/friend's Duster 110PS get trapped, so fascinated to have 4WD in my new car (till today had to walk that much to reach the farmhouse in monsoon, that is 4-5times/year).
I am most delighted with features of XUV500 AWD, but my knowledge in cars is just to open up the hood. I don't know the meaning of little rattle or kitkat noise, only know when something major happens, e.g 1) I don't know when one of the tyre has low air pressure (once on road with full A/C & audio, I heard flap-flap sound on one side of car, stopped the car, seen RHS back tyre gone haywire as puncture might had occurred some way back & car ran on flat tyre & the tyre teared of & make noise), 2) occas press break paddle but no breaking occurs, live with that & while returning to home town 200 kms stretch, gradually break stopped working, break warning light came up persistent, & last few kms to home were managed by hand brake & slow speed. Many examples but what I meant to reinstate is I can't diagnose car problem or origin of problem just with minor sound or driving pattern change. So in XUV500 I am scared that small niggle will start & if in time I had not found it, major catastrophe might occur. So everyday my heart start with XUV500 AWD & mind insists to do more study. Now as I am more here, I like to love my vehicle with all its features & niggles, enjoy all its features every day, & may be few visits to ASS for niggles is OK, but real scared if car stall on highway.
So next comes Rexton Rx6 & PS, with features in decreasing order (as I am bit gizmo fan, I think my shortcoming of car knowledge will be balanced by different sensors on the dashboard - but XUV500 dashboard is loaded with tons of sensors light, but mind says they are Chinese & hence may be not dependable).
The only problem with PS is 1) only 1 ASS/dealer in Gujarat is in Surat, that is 333Km away, 2) will Mitsubishi will be available in India/Gujarat for next 10 years.
Problem with Rx6 1) Mahindra & rest you all know that.
Don't know where to compromise?!?
Had driven Chevrolet Enjoy & Tavera, but appear taxi vehicles without much recent features like Navigation, Reverse Camera, Steering controls, Auto ORVM.
Ford endeavor, tata safari/storme appear aged vehicles.
And yes, no AT please.
So now to decide between
XUV500 AWD (pro: for its never ending feature list, cons: Mahindra, Chinese sensors) &
Rexton Rx6 MT (pro: 4L switch, Sunroof, many features although less than XUV, cons: Mahindra, long term future) &
PS Boss (Pros: legacy, super select 4WD, ruggedness etc, cons: less features of all but will watch your thread & implement all your mods to improve features list, only 1 ASS far up)
The features i miss in the Pajero Sport are more the automatic wipers, auto lock - nothing else really, tyretronics would have been nice but those you can always get after market - voice commands is frankly useless. I have managed to install cruise control - so that was a must for me. I also had the MID installed, so didnt miss much. Yes ESP and more airbags would have been welcome, but i believe this will come shortly in the AT version around september this year.
I don't like AT I am chauffer driven + can't accept decreased fuel efficiency just for AT ( I know many would not agrre, but that is my inclination) + want to enjoy 4WD at its maximum. But after watch your thread, I had asked for MID as option & sales person has agreed to do that with extra 22K expense + 10K for cruise control ( I had shown him your thread).
I dont see need of HLA, HDC
Last Diwali we went to Rajasthan & near Rana Pratap memorial at Haldi Ghati, my Innova easily climbed up the hill with passengers, but my friend's Duster could not climb but drifted back, so we kept big stones behind rear wheels & revv up the car & ultimately reached the chetak memorial at hilltop. I wonder if HLA (Hill Hold Control) would have helped to overcome the situation without manual help. But again I think 4HLc of PS or 4L of Rx6 could manage very easily.
do remember Pajero is a purist vehicle, this has minimum ECU control and pure driver's vehicle. I would like to retain that character of the Pajero
I never think that way, but I fully agree with that. I think my dislike for AT has roots in this view.