Re: The Mighty Mitsubishi Pajero Sport Drives In [17K Kms Crossed]
XUV has more useable space, while Pajero feels like a Cedia on stilts. That is the biggest deterrent for my dad, but I think I can convince him in that regard. Now that I have learnt of a new gen in the making, I would wait for it.
I found XUV's FM to be better than Pajero's FM. But, neither is as bad as Fortuner's(pre-facelift) audio.
Sorry for my late revert, its been some crazy travel. Chalk and Cheese comparison but since you are an XUV owner it is but inevitable. The knee room for a driver appears to be limited but once you adjust the seat you kinda get used to it. I have known tall drivers having no complaints. Next time you TD it make sure you explore the entire range of the seats. I find the Pajero seats comfortable for long driving, XUV ones are too, well contoured as well.
You will find the clutch extremely heavy though coming from XUV.
Pajero width is limited , so expect it to be not as spacious as XUV - but for 3 average adults its fine. The second row his adjustable to help with space management.
The stock kenwood system is surely better than the stock XUV system - even for my very average non audiophile ears. XUV radio is especially is poor sounding, thats where the PS is way better.
So are you looking to purchase a PS ?
You will find the clutch extremely heavy though coming from XUV.
Pajero width is limited , so expect it to be not as spacious as XUV - but for 3 average adults its fine. The second row his adjustable to help with space management.
The stock kenwood system is surely better than the stock XUV system - even for my very average non audiophile ears. XUV radio is especially is poor sounding, thats where the PS is way better.
So are you looking to purchase a PS ?
![Big Smile [:D] [:D]](https://www.theautomotiveindia.com/forums/images/smilies/Big%20Smile.gif)
I found XUV's FM to be better than Pajero's FM. But, neither is as bad as Fortuner's(pre-facelift) audio.