Come on Vipul, be a sport, there is nothing like spoiling the ownership thread, it's just about getting facts right..........
Thanks for the NOC buddy...
Errr... I feel it is the XUV which has stiffer springs than the Aria. That is the reason Aria's ride is better and XUV's handling is better.
Well,this is one of the weirdest logic I have ever heard.Why?
Softer springs=Unsettled ride at high speeds.There are thousands of examples like Verna,Vento etc.
This gives a cushion like ride at lower speeds and everyone knows it very well that XUV and Scorpio both are low-speed ride kings...add Verna and Vento too to the list.
Why it happens?
Because if the suspension is soft,then it will depress a bit too much on undulations at high speeds and make the ride unsettled or say jiggly.Typical characteristics that can be observed in Verna and XUV.
I hope I don't need to own an XUV for stating my points!!
The UV has got soft springs with shorter travel,which depress very easily on even mild undulations at lower speeds and the ride is good at moderate speeds like 60-80 kph and after that the game starts changing.
While if you have 7 passengers on board then the unsettlement is more and less both at the same time.
Handling thing?
No reply from my side,first of all please define me what sort of handling you people are talking of?I mean Quick steering with negligible body roll,'slight' quick steering with body roll,moderate steering with moderate body roll or what sort of handling parameter you people are comparing the cars?
In my views:
Handling:Precise steering with good weight and responsiveness+rigid chassis+settled high speed ride.(I haven't mentioned body roll because SUVs have loads of it)
And vice versa for cars with tighter sprung suspension...AND HENCE ARIA AND SAFARI,BOTH HAVE TIGHTER SUSPENSION.Any doubt?
Err exactly wht i was thinking, the XUV is more configured for handling than ride quality. Its stiffer and hence low speed ride is stiff, i find the high speed ride better (high for me is over 80kmph), whereas the Aria is exactly opposite its set up for Ride quality and hence has soft springs.
^^Please consult the above reply..
I am not a technical person like most so many experts here but I feel spring in XUV is definitely on softer side which is very helpful in handling as well as driving at slower speeds.
I think I was also saying the same and that also in 'english' only.But still no one understood it!!
I hope,the owner's words will make some impact.
When I had first bought it without taking a test drive, I had thought I would mainly drive it on highways while my AT i10 will help me in city drive but I was very positively surprised when I started driving my XUV in congested city roads of Delhi. It handles even slow speeds very well.
As for high speeds, it gets to 100-120 mark effortlessly and simply breezes along. Steering does feel bit light at times but then not to a level where U feel any problem. In fact, light steering is a 'boon' in this car.
To conclude, I feel XUV500 drives and handles very good both at low and high speeds, and hats off to engineers at Mahindra for pulling it off.
Buddy,I really praise your honesty towards yourself and your ride.Your words maybe agreed or not by me,but still I praise the fact that you mention exactly what you felt..not what you have read or heard from anywhere.I too believe in what I have felt,what I have experienced myself.Only issue is that people feel me biased against the car for two cons pointed out by me but are unable to find the 12 pros which I have mentioned at the same time!!!