Well, I am posting a pic of a Xylo which killed 6 people because of it's terribly unstable suspension! There were 8 people of a family travelling in the car near Namakkal, Tamil Nadu on the way to a marriage with speeds close to 100 on a 4 lane highway when the driver, a lawyer, suddenly lost control of the car when it entered a small bridge and hit the divider and rolled over to the other side of the road and fell into a 15ft gorge! 6/8 people were killed! RIP!
Dear DJ Bro,
If you go about posting pics of accidents of Xylo, I can do the same with Ertiga as well.
Here you go -
Another one -
There are countless others. All it needs is a Google search. So lets not go into that.
All I am trying to say that, while entering the bridge, on the metal joints of the bridge, the high speed has caused the suspension to kick back and bounce which resulted in losing control! Similar incidents happened to many more Xylos and Scorpios!
Does that mean all Scorpios and Xylos which are driven on that road end up in a crash?
They both have awesome power, but if you try to enjoy it, you will end up like this (Especially without fastening seatbelts)!
Bad logic, I must say.
There is a saying - with power comes responsibility. Manufacturers may give you power, it is your responsibility to use it wisely and responsibly, understanding the limitations of the vehicle.
Accidents happen because of the driver, not the vehicle.
A truck has poorer dynamics and worser suspension than a Xylo, how come every truck on that bridge doesn't crash?
The next pic is a Scorpio is on the Noida Expressway, Delhi at high speeds early morning when on the bridge, lost control, hit and dangling on the sidewall! With one or three alive people inside! Two people' including the driver were dead! RIP all!
so I dont recommend these two cars to anyone, but even if you buy it, dont drive too fast and fasten your seatbelts all the time!
So by looking at the pics of the Ertiga now, I hope you wont recommend the Ertiga to anyone anymore.
@Raj I agree that Xylo is more spacious than ertiga but not cramped as your picture suggests. I am a 6 footer and find it comfy but 3rd row is not comfy as Xylo.
That's okay. I showed you a picture of mine seated in the middle row with the third row down. Its upto you to decide.
On mileage it returns 16 to 19 kms with AC 100% If you do not get some where there then you need to check your driving habit. My car returns better FE than my friends swift. We tested in our last trip of 600kms to and fro and also in Chennai b2b traffic.
Are you saying that in Chennai b2b, you got 16-19 kmpl?
Thats a little difficult to believe, with no offense to you. Or else b2b traffic in Chennai maybe lighter than the traffic we have here in Mumbai.
My Punto having the same engine never gave anything more than 14 kmpl (with a very very gentle throttle) in b2b traffic. So, 19 kmpl seems questionable. Anyways, I wont debate on that.
You car maybe returning better FE than your friend's Swift simply because he maybe heavy on the throttle compared to you. Else technically, the Swift should return more FE.
By the way, FE is not the most important aspect for every customer. M&M offers more power and torque with the mHawk engine. Also, if you want FE, you can opt for the D2 or D4 variants with the mDi engine.
P.S.: I am not saying Ertiga is a bad car. It is a fine car for city dwellers if the average height of the family is not very tall. But if you really need a proper 7 seater and which is spacious as well, then the bigger UVs have their own advantages and disadvantages. Similar to every other car in the market, even the Ertiga has some disadvantages.