I just have one thing to say about the comparison of XUV's niggles with the other reliable vehicles.
Let's take the Innova, Storme and Duster for example.
Thanks for bringing sanity by comparing the car relatively to cars in its price range and product category .
Compared to the XUV, how many features do they have?
less .
Things can only go wrong if they are present in the first place. You cannot complain about the lack of sweetness in a coffee after you have ordered "a coffee without sugar", can you?
True .
And it doesn't change the fact that the other coffee available is too sweet . Means the innova and storme don't have features and so no niggles. And the Xuv has features and also have / had niggles . And why reporting them is a problem ?
The more the complicated electronics, the more the chances are of one of them to fail. The same applies to luxury brands like Merc, BMW and RR, which has a lot of electronic creature comforts. In stark contrast, the competition carries just the basics and hence there is nothing in it to fail.
completely agree with you .
I am not defending the XUV's niggles here. Of course, it is M&M's duty to make sure that if they are offering so and so features, it should work as intended mostly, if not always. But when we are comparing the XUV's niggles to vehicles like the Innova which does not carry even half the features of the former, does it make sense?
What matters is the end result for * some *people .
What is the objective thing here ? It is that innova has no features hence no major niggles . Xuv has features and also niggles ( many of them already solved by mahindra , infact some had major niggles some had no niggles . You have this vibrating problem Singh 890 has no such problem and my friend who has the first batch xuv has many problems but not the one which you have )
What if somebody's priority is less features but no major niggles ? That's when innova , storme , duster comes in as a example when it is relatively compared . If someone is ok with niggles but want features of course the xuv is a clear winner .
Mechanical failures in the XUV like brake grinding noise, clutch failure, etc. is not part of the above discussion and M&M is solely and wholly responsible for them. But most of XUV's issues are related to its features, which competitors clearly lack.
And reporting them is bad or good in the forum ?
Tata's example of a car which was as heavily loaded as the XUV in terms of features was the Aria... and it was not free of niggles either.
+100 Exactly .
you being involved on both xuv and aria thread equally , I want to know from you what will you call such examples ? Or how would you react to such post and examples if THE XOVER had given them ? ( in spite being a open tata motors hardcore fan he has never done such things )
Right after buying my Civic, I have realized that the Civic has 3 known issues -
1) Power steering pump and rack leakage - costs 30k
2) Front wheel bearings noise - costs 14k
3) Suspension weakening - costs 30k
Honda has never bothered to issue a recall for the car for the above issues. Also, most of the times, they do not even bother to cover the above known issues under warranty, unless the customer raises his voice. In contrast, M&M is more than happy to change the faulty parts under warranty. Even wear and tear parts like brake and clutch is replaced under warranty, without any questioning. Some say, it is M&M's duty to do so. So is Honda's duty to change the parts in all Civics. Are they doing it? So much for "Japanese reliability".
Mahindra and tata are only 2 companies I have read and heard about who change parts under warranty without even questioning a single word .
We're as Toyota and Honda and even maruti is extremely adamant in doing so inspite of their fault in some cases .
How can we teach them lesson ? by fighting back , how ? by starting threads on forums and questioning and ridiculing their reliability and by bringing Awareness across the board .
Now tomorrow if you start such thread and if I support you will you and me be bad mouthing Honda , Toyota , or maruti and their cars ? And how would you react if someone comes and gives you a example by saying the jaguar has niggles so what is so big issue if the Honda has niggles ?
we are on a public forum which shares latest information by posting findings and facts , news in the automotive world
. The xuv is a indeed a fantastic effort and a great vehicle from mahindra and being a first generation vehicle it came with its niggles ( mahindra has even taken care of most of the niggles ) , posting the niggles is not bad mouthing the car, finding obvious flaws , or reporting even bad a.s.s from mahindra is not bad mouthing it's is just posting facts ( everything posted was provided with links and pics) . If it's not done car marker will not take things seriously and take the consumer for ride .
But it seems some take anything wrong said about mahindra or their cars so personally as if their self esteem is crushed . Or as if they were the ones who designed the cars , or are employees of mahindra .
But by posting justifications just because these cars also have niggles so it's ok that xuv can also have niggles is as funny as it can get .
And if it's ok and fine then this logic must be applied to all cars safari , nano , aria , tavera , swift , storme , manza , and all . Iam wrong here ?
We are in the end consumers . We are not cheerleaders of some brands that we have to out of the way go and defend the car and the brand since we love or own it . ( not mentioning you here at all )
Okey so leaving apart the niggles of Xuv and Range Rover;
when is the W4 expected?
I think they will announce it anytime .
And what exactly does clading means?
See the attached pic .
And how much does OE Xuv alloys would cost?
Xuv owners or iron rock might help you here .