Answer is simple - whoever wants to
Yes you can say that but fact is very few people opt
Why can't you think of these vehicles for city families? Are these vehicles equivalent to submarines or spacecrafts? Please clarify.
I can not think of because for me they are not at all comfortable and i don't want such a big vehicle for city commuting. You may like to have submarines or spacecrafts for yourself for that but that is all personal decision. After all it's democracy.
Maybe so but still these vehicles have not been banned from private personal use? Correct? So whats stopping anybody from buying it?
Absolutely correct but you have to ask people only as I have already clarified my point above.
Yes my dear it is a failure from a company sales perspective & wrong image portrayed for marketing etc. But from an innovation & cost to customer maybe its not. When you get nothing else but barely an auto rickshaw for under 2lakhs today TM is giving you a real car with AC etc for roughly the same cost. Tell me how is this a bad deal to the customer & How is this a failure?
Failure is a failure, you can have n number of reasons for the same. People don't just like that buy innovated product. Aam Aadmi think a lot before putting their hard earned money and in that perceptive nano failed to hit the right cord in the common mans heart. Even the HONDA Jazz was a failure for HONDA because of obvious reasons.
The onroad cost of M&M EVo is lesser than Honda Brio & both are almost same size & meant for city use, only that running cost of eVo is 50ps perkm & Brio is Rs5 perkm. So tell me where is the high initial cost? If you meant high initial cost for OEM then how does the customer care about that? as long as he is getting the car for a cost he finds reasonable.
First of all you can not compare these two vehicles as they are totally of different league. It seem you are not aware about the price and dimensional details of two cars. However if you compare with respect to Price, i want to clarify that Evo has only two variants of highest priced at 7.135 whereas Brio has six variants priced from 4.26 lakhs to 6.30 lakhs Ex showroom. Even the top variants has the price difference of over 80K in ex showroom price, leave apart the on-road. Also, brio is much bigger and heavier than Evo.
It is not that people have not checked Evo, even i had checked it before finalizing. But when i am getting brio at 4.9 lakhs on road, why i like to spend 8 lakhs for Evo and than 1.2 to 1.5 lakhs every 2-3 years for the replacement of batteries. For me that was not acceptable even though running cost of Evo is 50 Paisa per km. As i said earlier said, still some time is there for electric vehicles to become competitive in the market and it may come up with more innovations.
Bottomline is one need not justify his choice to anybody whether it be a Brio or a Land Rover. You spend your money the way you want to. Right?
Your bottom line is not correct and answer is right there because i can definitely justify my purchase as i am the one who is spending the money and if you check my earlier posts i am justifying only mine not others. But looks like you are trying to justify Tata motors and Mahindra vehicle which is good even i like it. As an indian i am proud on TATA and Mahindra & Mahindra. I own good quantity of equity shares of both the automomile companies too
. But when it comes to putting your hard earned lakhs of money in something, we go for more reliable and practical things. Definitely i do that