For less road noise and better handling I would recommend Michelin.
If you are looking at Bridgestone the ER300, ER60 and Potenza GIII are also good.
Bridgestone tend to be noisy.But some far they are more durable, but people with Michelin XM2 have been equally happy about the durability.
You have not mentioned the tire size, So I cannot say which Bridgestone/Michelin models would be applicable to you.
ER300 is the best option available in this size for the requirements mentioned. They are asymmetrical, hence handling is good.
Potenza are also good but being softer than ER 300, lifespan is less and at present availability of Potenza in this size is also a problem
@jp, ER60 is not available in this size unless the OP decides to upsize in lieu of some FE.
Other premium manufacturers are not manufacturing in this size.
ER300 is the best option available in this size for the requirements mentioned. They are asymmetrical, hence handling is good.
Potenza are also good but being softer than ER 300, lifespan is less and at present availability of Potenza in this size is also a problem
@jp, ER60 is not available in this size unless the OP decides to upsize in lieu of some FE.
Other premium manufacturers are not manufacturing in this size.
I read your thread for manza tyres, and could figure out the two BS tyres that you have named above. Even I am inclined towards ER300. Any critical parameter that ER 300 don't do good in? I mean What can be possible disadvantage of ER300?
YES, FE decreases by 1 km at leas. Before we discuss upsizing , it's important to know rim width.
Manza tyre thread talks about suitable up size for its rim width.
None, for your requirements.
YES, FE decreases by 1 km at leas. Before we discuss upsizing , it's important to know rim width.
Manza tyre thread talks about suitable up size for its rim width.
You travelled 40k in Apollo Accelere?
My polo is having MRF ZVTV & it has been almost worn out till the wear indicator mark on tyre! Done only 27230+kms.
Jihu, please share, manufacturing date car (as on RC), manufacturing date of tyres as itched on sidewall of the tires, date of purchase of the car.
My experience with MRF has not lasted more than 30 to 35 kkm in the past.
You travelled 40k in Apollo Accelere?
My polo is having MRF ZVTV & it has been almost worn out till the wear indicator mark on tyre! Done only 27230+kms.
Yeah.
I am guessing that diesel polo has more wear tear on tyres as compared to petrol ones, may be due to heavy nose on former.
I have driven on really ugly roads and on top of that did WAWB only twice in the span of 40k, still tyres are not that bad in shape.