Re: Spied! Maruti Suzuki Baleno RS 1.0L Boosterjet
No Suzuki will never face failure in India as I have observed for several years, majority of Indian car buyer thinks Maruti is a safe bet even if its priced higher because of the vastness of service network and because some believe its an Indian brand.
Also I am quit confused how Maruti will be pricing its next gen Swift, arguably that will be Marutis biggest success maker after the 2006 Swift, 2015 Brezza success stories
Honda wont come up with a Jazz and 1.5P, which would have made a huge sense, always small hatch backs with slightly large petrol motors are way way better than small hatch backs with small petrol motors, because in real world they give better efficiency and way better power when needed.
Agree with this the Baleno 1.2 petrol and even diesel are well balanced products but not the boosterjet, its over priced, I would have completely agreed with you if this car had 110 PS and 170 NM like it has in other markets, despite reduced power and a light 950 kg kerb weight it is got just 21.1 kmpl , an Ecosport 1.0 ecoboost with 123 ps, 170 NM and which is tall at 200 mm above ground and has less coefficient of Drag gets ARAI 18.9 kmpl and the Trend+ variant is almost same price as the Baleno RS as well, so this is not a good start however one may try, but as said by me before, this is a Maruti , so it will never be a failure, it will stand as a topping for the already fantastic baleno sales fgure
One must understand that Jazz,Polo,Ecosport,all have scored good results in these tests and Jazz which feels light actually has a better score than the Baleno despite the Jazz chassis being over 4 years older than Marutis new Baleno chassis
So it is in no way an impressive feat by Maruti, too late to the strong cars party!!
But is it a better car? See Polo is far better car than Baleno, thats my point, one may say the Maruti is reliable etc etc, but what about the substance, why buy an inferior machine just because it has a turbo motor?
Premium mask in the name of nexa Kenichi Ayukawa is doing the same mistake as Honda's overpriced cars, I hope suzuki will see its end in near twenty years. What!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Rs.8,69.000 ex show room price. Damn overpriced. They may slowly lose nexa as well as regular maruti, death pill, because customers like me don't want to go for nexa because not worth at the same time comparing nexa cars to maruti cars caught in puzzle at the end going for some other brand. Slow poison for Suzuki India.
-suryaputhra
-suryaputhra
Also I am quit confused how Maruti will be pricing its next gen Swift, arguably that will be Marutis biggest success maker after the 2006 Swift, 2015 Brezza success stories
Haha ! #Jokeoftheday #BalenoRs!
It may sell & also Honda may come up with Jazz 1.5P @ 9.99 Lakhs !!
Meanwhile only me getting a feeling that the new front bumper is from the mobilio ?!
It may sell & also Honda may come up with Jazz 1.5P @ 9.99 Lakhs !!
Meanwhile only me getting a feeling that the new front bumper is from the mobilio ?!
But if you carefully see the Nexa products, one finds some aspects thrown in at those price points which are not offered by competitors.
- I20 has great build quality, 6 airbags, but a weakling of a petrol engine (relatively speaking).
- Honda Jazz has the same issue with the 1.2 iVTEC from an everyday urban commute perspective.
- Polo TSI comes across as costlier, with the reputation for higher maintenance costs and perceived unreliability of the DSG.
-The Figo DCT does not fully live up to its paper potential (IMO the transmission holds back the engine performance), add to that the 14 in wheels and lesser features.
- The Abarth Punto is the best product in this range, but suffers from poor market response, and is way pricier.
For ~10-10.5 lac, you have a turbo-petrol Maruti Baleno with good space, consumer-friendly features, an enhanced performance and disc-brakes to back it up. Maruti is surely testing the waters with a calculated risk. It intends to scoop out some sales from all these competitors, and also offer some of its wait-listed customers a chance to shell out a bit of a premium in exchange of more performance.
I would say it is an opportunity for those buyers who are interested in its competitors to negotiate better deals!
- I20 has great build quality, 6 airbags, but a weakling of a petrol engine (relatively speaking).
- Honda Jazz has the same issue with the 1.2 iVTEC from an everyday urban commute perspective.
- Polo TSI comes across as costlier, with the reputation for higher maintenance costs and perceived unreliability of the DSG.
-The Figo DCT does not fully live up to its paper potential (IMO the transmission holds back the engine performance), add to that the 14 in wheels and lesser features.
- The Abarth Punto is the best product in this range, but suffers from poor market response, and is way pricier.
For ~10-10.5 lac, you have a turbo-petrol Maruti Baleno with good space, consumer-friendly features, an enhanced performance and disc-brakes to back it up. Maruti is surely testing the waters with a calculated risk. It intends to scoop out some sales from all these competitors, and also offer some of its wait-listed customers a chance to shell out a bit of a premium in exchange of more performance.
I would say it is an opportunity for those buyers who are interested in its competitors to negotiate better deals!
I think while I am seen a lot of people are complaining about why Baleno RS is priced soo much Higher above the 1.2 Aplha are missing some aspects.
The RS complies with Frontal and side impact tests, while discs and Turbocharger less smaller engine would have increased weight by around 10KG, its the structural safety bits added which account for much of gain to 950KG for this car making it heavier than the Diesel Baleno. Similarly the New Ertiga's and Ciaz's which are going to sold in NEXA also are quietly weighing heavier since they too will comply with crash tests. I think Maruti is on the right track by making sure thier cars from the launch of the Brezza are now meeting crash test requirements.
With its imported Engine its bound to cost much more than the 1.2 Baleno.
The RS complies with Frontal and side impact tests, while discs and Turbocharger less smaller engine would have increased weight by around 10KG, its the structural safety bits added which account for much of gain to 950KG for this car making it heavier than the Diesel Baleno. Similarly the New Ertiga's and Ciaz's which are going to sold in NEXA also are quietly weighing heavier since they too will comply with crash tests. I think Maruti is on the right track by making sure thier cars from the launch of the Brezza are now meeting crash test requirements.
With its imported Engine its bound to cost much more than the 1.2 Baleno.
So it is in no way an impressive feat by Maruti, too late to the strong cars party!!
Baleno has a better power to weight ratio and in a MT version ticks well for enthusiasts.
As mentioned VW's notorious service and the still to be proved DSG in India, Baleno RS makes it a winning hot hatch than VW's TSI.
Source- ACI
As mentioned VW's notorious service and the still to be proved DSG in India, Baleno RS makes it a winning hot hatch than VW's TSI.
Source- ACI