I didn't know you were talking about PUC machine.You mentioned smoke test.That was confusing
The poor FE is due to the fuel going past the cat con.Burning of a rich mixture.
In this case a pressure test is more suitable to finding a cat con problem than a PUC test.Since the PUC reading can be high due to a faulty O2 Sensor as well.
My mistake
![Frustration [frustration] [frustration]](https://www.theautomotiveindia.com/forums/images/smilies/Frustration.gif)
Really sorry for that, everytime I use to say only smoke test instead of that and So really i forgot the name PUC
![Roll Eyes [roll] [roll]](https://www.theautomotiveindia.com/forums/images/smilies/Roll.gif)
Thanks for making it clear for the readers :)
"The poor FE is due to the fuel going past the cat con.Burning of a rich mixture"
How this can happen due to a faulty catcon? No Keith, Thats not possible.
AFR has no direct relation with the catcon. so it wont go rich or lean. But when the catcon is clogged it will get more restrictive and hence reduces the performance.
"In this case a pressure test is more suitable to finding a cat con problem than a PUC test"
I dont know whether it can used for finding the catcon issue, if yes then this is the thing you must have said instead of making the checkup by physically removing the catcon.
"Since the PUC reading can be high due to a faulty O2 Sensor as well"
If the O2 sensor before the catcon is faulty then this will give a wrong result. I agree.
But Keith, dont forget we started talking about analyzing a catcon in such as way that by assuming our O2 sensors are healthy.