The Bolt does appear upmarket (vs the vista) and perhaps it is a big step up for Tata;However from the customer perspective TML is not known for highly reliable products (thats the general view-not mine).
If the customer is to choose between a reliable but older, smaller (swift) car he will perhaps ,given the trust with maruti, stay with MSIL.
The i10,i10grand are great cars;my take is that even though the bolt may be better on various counts it will take a while for the customer to see and actually experience this
So,how do you get people to start trying your product-my wish was a sub4 lakh entry point,just for 2-3 months-like the XUV; once people accept your product then get rationale with the price
If the customer is to choose between a reliable but older, smaller (swift) car he will perhaps ,given the trust with maruti, stay with MSIL.
The i10,i10grand are great cars;my take is that even though the bolt may be better on various counts it will take a while for the customer to see and actually experience this
So,how do you get people to start trying your product-my wish was a sub4 lakh entry point,just for 2-3 months-like the XUV; once people accept your product then get rationale with the price
@ Its time TATA gets some credit for the hard work they have put in. I hope that this time its been rectified and people feel they are given that importance they deserve while purchasing their CAR.
![Frustration [frustration] [frustration]](https://www.theautomotiveindia.com/forums/images/smilies/Frustration.gif)
I dont think TATA should tryout Mahindraesque pricing policy. .
![Wink [;)] [;)]](https://www.theautomotiveindia.com/forums/images/smilies/Wink.gif)
Everybody is doing it in the name of introductory pricing so why shouldn't TATA do it .
I wish very best of luck to TATA to succeed in their current re-entry .