Re: Looking For An Automatic Transmission Sedan!
I am not a fan of CVT. I am yet to own a CVT. I am just creating awareness here about the availability of CVTs. Don't be surprised if in the next few years you see less geared-automatics than CVTs. High speed / powerful german cars now have CVTs. They are not stupid. In fact CVT is banned in race cars (can you beat that?). It proved several seconds faster than the geared-automatics. Yes it races without that jerky, manly, powery feeling that we all love. If you read my post, I clearly suggested that the prospective buyer must test drive. You never know. You don't want to deprive a potential CVT lover (there are many in the US and Europe - not that they are any less macho than us) from trying it out.
Only one German car right now on sale in India has CVT, which one: Audi A4 2.0 TDI and that car also suffers with the made-for-each-other issue of CVT and that issue is of responsiveness under hard acceleration after a point like you can feel in those Activas and all.
You are doing 80 kph and try to do pedal to metal in a CVT and see how it first of all hesitates, then it starts moving ahead and then slowly it catches the speed. Look at the rev needle, no matter where in the rev range true power lies, the CVT will simply rise the revs as per the need of those 2 belt connected wheels which can change their size in a number of steps
![Laugh [lol] [lol]](https://www.theautomotiveindia.com/forums/images/smilies/Laugh.gif)
Yups for an engine like a turbo petrol or a supercharged petrol the CVT can also be fun as the engine has a very wide torque spread in fact for turbo diesels also it can be fine as the engine has a good lower end and mid range but in case of a N/A petrol, the CVT makes it just difficult to churn out all the power available. Yes I know that with CVT it is easy to keep the engine at a 4-6k mark quite easily from the instant you start but the way it delivers power puts me off. Still once the revs fell, the CVT is again that slow to react gearbox in which the revs do rise suddenly to the redline but since the pulleys keep on changing their size slowly, the vehicle never feels like it is moving ahead like a proper automatic gearbox and adding to it is the sound the vehicle makes
![Frustration [frustration] [frustration]](https://www.theautomotiveindia.com/forums/images/smilies/Frustration.gif)
BTW, CVT was banned in formula 1 because there was no room in the set of rules for the unlimited gear ratio combos that the CVT offers as the cars do need to have a specific number of gear ratios also manufacturing a belt that could handle so much power would have been an issue.
@Vipul
I agree with you that Altis and Laura might be overpriced, but they are in different segment than these Honda city,Rapid and vento. So need to think about that pricing
It is the Altis which is overpriced, Laura is priced correctly and TSi is simply priced lower than what this car deserves. If your colleague can go upto 17 lac(like for Altis) then why not check the Laura TSi A/T. The 7 speed DSG offers better and more refined performance as well as fantastic FE too as compared to the M/T variant. There are no GC issues with this car, it has got a BIG boot, ride and handling are exceptionally good, steering response is fantastic and engine is better less said, everyone knows what a brutal force the TSi comes packed with.
About Honda city no doubt it is an excellent car, but the buyer is not happy with its GC issue on speed breakers. Thank you for your suggestions here
Buddy wait for a moment, with the new variant the GC has been increased a bit and hence the GC issues are quite sorted out now.
Rafian and Vipul, your discussion has really put me in little confusion here and what is your take on Rapid/Vento
Naa, the auto box isn't as much good. If you need an auto box in this category then look at Honda or maybe Fiesta A/T(if your friend can agree by any ways) else rise the bar and think of Fluence or Corolla or Laura.