Re: New Tata Safari 'Storme' Now Officially Breaks Cover
hmmm many people are getting interested just because of turning radius alone
hmmm many people are getting interested just because of turning radius alone
Tata Safari Storme Breaks Cover (Launch Coverage: Pg.301+)
- Thread Starter RSM
- Start date
- Status
Re: New Tata Safari 'Storme' Now Officially Breaks Cover
Here you go:
I still haven't seen the pics for last seats, jump seats. Need to see whether the headroom has increased. Anyone with pics of these, 
.
.
Re: New Tata Safari 'Storme' Now Officially Breaks Cover
@vishwas, thanks a lot buddy![[clap]](https://www.theautomotiveindia.com/forums/images/smilies/Clap.gif "Clap [clap]")
.
But still finding it difficult to say whether there is drastic increase in headroom coz those curves at C pillar are still there![[confused]](https://www.theautomotiveindia.com/forums/images/smilies/Confused.gif "Confused [confused]")
.
Did anyone sit on jump seats ??
@vishwas, thanks a lot buddy
.But still finding it difficult to say whether there is drastic increase in headroom coz those curves at C pillar are still there
.Did anyone sit on jump seats ??
Re: New Tata Safari 'Storme' Now Officially Breaks Cover
Those jump seats are a true negative to the new Safari,have tested the XUV to its limits and after this testing it looks like Tata needs to bring a bit too much improved model to cope up with this SUV.
@Droy:
About Scorpio and Safari,both of them have a bit too much of body roll,only difference is that Safari is still confident at cruising speeds but Scorpio is better at city speeds.Rest I myself have once owned a Scorpio too and what I feel is that maybe Safari seems to have more body roll but its the Scorpio which turns turtle quite easily,same is being seen on roads/highways here,most of the overturning SUVs are Scorpios.
Those jump seats are a true negative to the new Safari,have tested the XUV to its limits and after this testing it looks like Tata needs to bring a bit too much improved model to cope up with this SUV.
@Droy:
About Scorpio and Safari,both of them have a bit too much of body roll,only difference is that Safari is still confident at cruising speeds but Scorpio is better at city speeds.Rest I myself have once owned a Scorpio too and what I feel is that maybe Safari seems to have more body roll but its the Scorpio which turns turtle quite easily,same is being seen on roads/highways here,most of the overturning SUVs are Scorpios.
Re: New Tata Safari 'Storme' Now Officially Breaks Cover
Think the company people haven't changed the C-Pillar as the side profile remains same as older version,but still its really small for people above 5.7ft or somthing,
@vishwas, thanks a lot buddy .
But still finding it difficult to say whether there is drastic increase in headroom coz those curves at C pillar are still there.
.But still finding it difficult to say whether there is drastic increase in headroom coz those curves at C pillar are still there
.
Re: New Tata Safari 'Storme' Now Officially Breaks Cover
well in my safari 4 people were seating at jump seat but none of there head was hitting roof ?
well in my safari 4 people were seating at jump seat but none of there head was hitting roof ?
Re: New Tata Safari 'Storme' Now Officially Breaks Cover
Definitely +1,when we used to own the Safari once we went to Jwala ji with total 8 people on board and three on the jump seats even none of them had their head strike the roof while at many places I did even 140+ speeds as well as some bad patches of road were encountered too.
Only problem was that two of them were nearly unconscious when we reached Jwala ji.And one of them even vomitted on the trip!!!
Definitely +1,when we used to own the Safari once we went to Jwala ji with total 8 people on board and three on the jump seats even none of them had their head strike the roof while at many places I did even 140+ speeds as well as some bad patches of road were encountered too.
Only problem was that two of them were nearly unconscious when we reached Jwala ji.And one of them even vomitted on the trip!!!
Re: New Tata Safari 'Storme' Now Officially Breaks Cover
![[lol]](https://www.theautomotiveindia.com/forums/images/smilies/Laugh.gif "Laugh [lol]")
well i have done 6hrs of trip (stopped only 2times) with people on jump seat non vomited but i will keep in mind that next time to give them plastic bag for vomit
well i have done 6hrs of trip (stopped only 2times) with people on jump seat non vomited but i will keep in mind that next time to give them plastic bag for vomit
Re: New Tata Safari 'Storme' Now Officially Breaks Cover
well i have done 6hrs of trip (stopped only 2times) with people on jump seat non vomited but i will keep in mind that next time to give them plastic bag for vomit
Well,this problem has a simple solution,get the people who often vomit in car seated on either front or middle seat and others on jump seats.In my case those were two girls/women and a guy on jump seats and after one vomited they were shifted to front rows but still all three of them were in a need for rest after reaching there.
In other words,only men must travel on those seats and hence there will be no need for any plastic bag.![[glasses]](https://www.theautomotiveindia.com/forums/images/smilies/Glasses.gif "Glasses [glasses]")
The he would have definitely driven a 2.6 that also with quite malfunctioning front suspension.why?Because 2.6 had an issue with suspension(Raj:correct me if I am wrong)and hence it many times used to behave the way mentioned by Tornado.
well i have done 6hrs of trip (stopped only 2times) with people on jump seat non vomited but i will keep in mind that next time to give them plastic bag for vomit
In other words,only men must travel on those seats and hence there will be no need for any plastic bag.
The he would have definitely driven a 2.6 that also with quite malfunctioning front suspension.why?Because 2.6 had an issue with suspension(Raj:correct me if I am wrong)and hence it many times used to behave the way mentioned by Tornado.
Re: New Tata Safari 'Storme' Now Officially Breaks Cover
Have a look at this thread: http://www.theautomotiveindia.com/f...omobiles-involved-accidents-30.html#post66489.
Again its not clear which Scorpio you owned?
2.6 or mHawk?
Those jump seats are a true negative to the new Safari,have tested the XUV to its limits and after this testing it looks like Tata needs to bring a bit too much improved model to cope up with this SUV.
@Droy:
About Scorpio and Safari,both of them have a bit too much of body roll,only difference is that Safari is still confident at cruising speeds but Scorpio is better at city speeds.Rest I myself have once owned a Scorpio too and what I feel is that maybe Safari seems to have more body roll but its the Scorpio which turns turtle quite easily,same is being seen on roads/highways here,most of the overturning SUVs are Scorpios.![[surprise]](https://www.theautomotiveindia.com/forums/images/smilies/Surprise.gif "Surprise [surprise]")
@Droy:
About Scorpio and Safari,both of them have a bit too much of body roll,only difference is that Safari is still confident at cruising speeds but Scorpio is better at city speeds.Rest I myself have once owned a Scorpio too and what I feel is that maybe Safari seems to have more body roll but its the Scorpio which turns turtle quite easily,same is being seen on roads/highways here,most of the overturning SUVs are Scorpios.
Again its not clear which Scorpio you owned?
2.6 or mHawk?
Re: New Tata Safari 'Storme' Now Officially Breaks Cover
as i said even on that post unless person dam drunk or total newbie else safari 99.9% not possible . also see one side of safari bumper is damaged which means it hit something at speed
as i said even on that post unless person dam drunk or total newbie else safari 99.9% not possible . also see one side of safari bumper is damaged which means it hit something at speed
Re: New Tata Safari 'Storme' Now Officially Breaks Cover
Well,mine was a 2008(January) 2.6 CRDe slx which was owned by us for a very short period of time and was sold even before 2009.And it always felt like its very unstable at high speeds.While the lesser nose heavy m-hawk is quite more stable but still not confident at high speeds.In other words,from the very first turbo 2.6 to current m-hawk,the high speed stability has always been an issue with the SCORPIO thing.
Definitely +1,I myself have driven Safari a lot,on hills,on plains,in villages and have done some really elevated speeds too and my experience says that overall controlling of Safari especially at high speeds is really better than Scorpio.
Something is missing in the discussion,what's that??..hmmm..[thinking]..yeah..where are Raj and THE-XOVER![[evil]](https://www.theautomotiveindia.com/forums/images/smilies/Evil.gif "Evil [evil]")
?? in this M&M vs Tata turning thread for adding much more needed spice for a good discussion!!
Well,mine was a 2008(January) 2.6 CRDe slx which was owned by us for a very short period of time and was sold even before 2009.And it always felt like its very unstable at high speeds.While the lesser nose heavy m-hawk is quite more stable but still not confident at high speeds.In other words,from the very first turbo 2.6 to current m-hawk,the high speed stability has always been an issue with the SCORPIO thing.
Definitely +1,I myself have driven Safari a lot,on hills,on plains,in villages and have done some really elevated speeds too and my experience says that overall controlling of Safari especially at high speeds is really better than Scorpio.
Something is missing in the discussion,what's that??..hmmm..[thinking]..yeah..where are Raj and THE-XOVER
?? in this M&M vs Tata turning thread for adding much more needed spice for a good discussion!!
Last edited:
- Status