All this "surge of power", "leaving petrols behind at traffic lights" blah-blah is because we compare turbo charged diesels to normal petrols.
Let us say that there is a 1500 cc Polo TSI. Now there would be few buyers who would spend close to 11 big ones (Remember, you pay 24% for any petrol car whose displacement is > 1200 cc... Correct me if I'm wrong) for a petrol hatchback, whose fuel costs are a bit too much, isn't it.
The same is not true for more premium cars, but the turbocharged petrol cars below 20L can be counted of fingers. Tata Revotron: Zest, Bolt. VW TSI: Polo GT TSI, Vento. Fiat T-jet: Linea T-jet. Ford: Ecosport EcoBoost. (Not including Audi here.) I can't recall anything else. While most diesels are turbocharged. It is true however, that diesels are more expensive then their petrol counterparts.
Above all this, one can still argue that Petrol-automatic combos outnumber Diesel-automatic combos.
Hope I was being clear here
And Happy Independence Day Jai Hind!
Last edited: