Re: Supreme Court Orders – No Sunfilms Allowed from 4th May 2012
a critic of this new sc order argues that
have they done a scientific study to show that criminal activity takes place in cars with sun films of any visibility.
they say that girls are being kidnapped and raped in cars with black tints, ok i can agree to that but what about cars with clear glass and female passengers won't people easily stare at them while they are seated in their cars and make them feel uneasy, while with sun films which are legally approved its not so clear to stare and the female passengers feel a little sense of privacy?
No sun films means more heat radiation into cars translating to more ac use which leads to more usage of fuel which in turn leads to pollution.
what have the cops being doing to cars with unapproved black tints? These cars have stickers of political parties and hence they don't catch them.
terrorist activities, i can have a clear glass load my ammunition in my closed garage and fire away at people, i can train my self to not look suspicious.
malls have various security checks on cars, they open the bonnet do they know what to look at and what seems abnormal? They open the trunk just look around but don't go through the luggage or bags kept there? i can also carry bombs on my self and let it blast in the underground parking. Cause metal detectors are only scanning at the entry to the mall area and not parking areas.
all of us law abiding citizens follow the law, while choosing a film we ask thousand times are these rto approved? The guys with black tints they get it cheap, the cops can remove it and they can fit it back up, but most of us guys look at sun films for heat rejection they cost, we will be in losses, what if while removing it our rear defoggers come of then what do we do?