What's the crawl ratio of the new Gurkha? With an axle ratio of 4.3, I have serious doubt that its crawl ratio would not better the crawl ratio of the erstwhile MM540s. How I wish it came with a 48 or even 50 crawl ratio. Slow 'n steady; like a tortoise!
Sam, let go of your apprehensions
.
The crawl of the new Gurkha is very good ,much better than that of the older version. Many reasons for this phenomenon: 1) Better power 2) Even though the gear ratio is 4.3 :1 , the final transmission is not very much affected since the "tire sizes" have reduced . If I were to put 33 " MT on the older Gurkha ,my crawl would fall appreciably and if I were to put a 36" ,my older Gurkha would stop crawling. The tire sizes have to be matched to the gear ratios. In the newer Gurkha ,although the gear ratio is 4.3:1 the final transmission wouldnt be far different since the tire sizes have been downgraded.
So they have forced the rear unburstable Merc differential into retirement. For reasons of cost perhaps? Bad move. Boooooooo!! Any idea what OEM are they fitting now in its place?
That indeed is a downside. I think we should not comment on the sturdiness of these yet ,since no one has tested them on the fields .
Your comments on the possibility of the power assist snapping the front CV joints when the front wheels are stuck?
This has been a common problem with many Gurkha owners. Indiscriminate use of the Differential lockers does create greater stress on the front axle especially left sided and can break . In all better to avoid the usage of the front lockers.
How well/unwell has the clutch of your Gurkha held up over all these years of use and abuse?
Had no issues with the clutch so far and I can say that most Gurkha owners hadnt a single problem related to the clutch
Have you had to make any repairs to the IFS of your Gurkha? If yes, what were the costs involved?
Sam, my Gurkha has made many a ascent while negotiating climbs and there are innumerable instances where the front wheels were more than 1 feet in the air and landed with a thud, but never ever had I to repair ,replace the front suspension assembly.
How is the performance of the Gurkha in slush will all that weight bogging it down? I suppose the lighter Mahindra jeeps would do better in this regard, diff locks apart of course?
Sam ,let me narrate to you a small incident.
Our Offrroading group had organized a Pan-India offroading event called as the "M-Cube" in 2012. The Day 1 was a slush-drag race,which saw atleast 25 participants ,jeeps ,gypsies and a lone Gurkha ( Owned by my friend Hemant Chaturvedi). Hemant is new to offroading and was his first ever offroading participation. He too decided to enter the drag race . Many seniors advised to stay away from this , since the Gurkha is a heavy vehicle. Hemant argued that since he had already paid the money and since there was the recovery team ,why not give it a try... TO everyones surprise Hemant finished 3rd in the race ,just a few seconds behind the second ,experienced jeeper.
LSPV and twin pot callipers on the Gurkha get my vote over the horrendous brakes on the Thar CRDe. Your take?
Braking is good and even ,had no issues with it.
One of our Moderators TD'd the Gurkha and commented that you have to be a Dara Singh (RIP) to operate the transfer case lever. True? Why? Also, I have heard that some Gurkhas (IDIs?) did come with hydraulic transfer cases while the new Gurkha comes with the mechanical one. True?
Lol ,Sam I liked the joke about the "gear shift" but it aint true. Yes the IDI Gurkhas equipped with OM 616 had hydraulic lockers ,the newer ones have cabled operated lockers. The former are difficult to service ,the latter are easier.
With your inputs, I hope this thread starts looking like an off road course.
Keep us updated. Thanks!